Wendy's News and Tidbits
As CEO and founder of EXL Media, people are constantly asking
me if traditional
media is necessary,
or how to make traditional
and online methods
work better together.
Fortunately for my
clients, I live and
breathe media.
It's not only necessary
to stay on top of
the game in today's
economy, it's my
passion, too. Following
are a few tidbits
every marketer needs
to know.
February 10, 2010
Over the past few months I have been
informing my
clients that
Facebook is a great
way to reach
moms as they spend a
great deal of
time there. I
call it the "doctors
office waiting
room" in that I feel mom's somewhat hang
out there waiting
for responses
to what they
post or looking
for new messages
from friends
and families.
For this reason
they may browse
advertisements
or company messages
on the side of
their facebook
page as they
would browse a stack
of magazines in the doctors
office. Several
clients have asked
me if I have any stats supporting this. So here is a recent study.
We have been running Facebook cpc ads for several
clients. Although
we see great click volume we have see very little conversion.
Mom Marketing
According to a Retail Advertising and Marketing Association
survey conducted by BIGresearch, women with children at home are
more likely to use Facebook, MySpace, and Twitter than average
adults. Additionally, 15.3% maintain their own blog.
Use of Popular
Social
Media (% of Category) |
| Regularly
or Occasionally Use |
Medium | Adults
18+ | Moms w/Children at Home |
Twitter | 15.0% | 16.5% |
MySpace | 34.4 | 42.4 |
Facebook | 50.2 | 60.3 |
Source: BIGresearch, 2009 |
Mike Gatti, Executive Director for RAMA, suggests
More than eight in
10 moms who use Facebook log on daily, and three in 10 log on
five or more times a day. More than four in 10 log on from their
cell phone/iPhone/Blackberry device at least some of the time.
Frequency of
Facebook
Logon by Moms |
Frequency | %
of Moms Responding |
5 or more times a day | 30.3% |
2-4 times a day | 37.6 |
Once a day | 15.2 |
3 or more times a week | 9.1 |
1-2 times a week | 5.5 |
Once a week | 1.2 |
2-3 times a month | 0.6 |
Once a month | 0.6 |
Source: Lucid Marketing,
January 2010 |
Moms' top reason for using Facebook is keeping in touch with
friends and family
(96%). About a quarter use the site to keep in touch with professional
contacts (23%) or play games/participate in quizzes (26%). 59.9%
feel neutral about the ads they see onFacebook, and only 5% strongly
dislike or are offended by them. While they don't mind ads, many
feel there are better ways for marketers to capture their attention
while they're on Facebook.
Moms are surprisingly willing to interact
with marketers on
Facebook, and their
open-ended feedback reveals a high level of sophistication and
marketing savvy.
Though individual comments don't constitute
a comprehensive study,
they are valuable
in considering the marketing message. When asked what advertisers
on Facebook should do that they aren't currently doing, moms say:
- "Provide exclusive offers (i.e., printable coupons, etc.).
Exclusive offers would entice me to respond to the message (not
just read/glance at [it]), and I might look them up on Facebook
and become a fan."
- "[Be] more interactive. Starbucks is a good example -
they just had a Facebook campaign where you could send a coupon
for a free Starbucks ice cream to a friend on Facebook."
- "Offer samples."
- "Certificates or coupons for freebies or special discount
offers. I always print those and use them."
- "Coupons/discounts for family places [such as] restaurants
or coupons for grocery stores."
- "[Be] a little more targeted with online store specials."
- "Just talk to us. Direct us to Twitter or a blog where
we can talk back. It's too complicated to carry on a conversation
on Facebook. Make it easy for us."
- "I'd like to be able to comment on something they post
without being alerted every time someone else makes a post. Sometimes
that becomes distracting."
BIGresearch's Simultaneous Media Usage Survey was compiled for
the Retail Advertising & Marketing Association, a division
of the National Retail Federation. The survey polled 4,206 moms
and 22,624 adults 18+. "Moms" are defined as women with
children at home who are younger than age 18.
November 5, 2009
I am often asked if people still listen to the
radio with the proliferation
of Ipods, satellite
radio and other forms
of digital audio.
Nielsen has provided
a study and claims
they do actually
listen to broadcast
media more than these
other forms. They
actually followed
the audio listening
habits of people
in five cities:
Seattle, Philadelphia,
Atlanta, Chicago
and Dallas. They also found that
it has higher daily
usage (minutes per
day) than web (excluding
email), newspaper and magazines. TV is the only medium that surpasses
usage per day.
I read the details
and found some interesting
stats.
-
Radio and
web usage increases
with those people
who have HHI$100k+
-
TV
usage increases with
people 55+ and lower income.
- 1/3 of web usage
happens at work.
- 44% of radio usage
is during commute
time
-
8.5% of newspaper
usage is spent while
eating
The Study: A Nielsen analysis of a media use
study conducted by the Council for
Research Excellence
(CRE) found that 77% of
adults are reached
by broadcast radio
on a daily basis,
second only to television
at 95%. This study,
in which consumers
were physically observed
consuming media throughout
the day, found that
Web/Internet (excluding email) reached 64%, newspaper 35%, and
magazines 27%.

In a deeper analysis of audio media titled “How
U.S. Adults Use Radio and Other Forms of Audio,” Nielsen
found that that 90% of consumers listen to some form of audio
media per day. The 77% who listen to broadcast radio surpass the
37% who listen to CDs and tapes and the 12% who listen to portable
audio devices. Broadcast radio also continues to play a major
role to all ages, with almost 80 percent of those aged 18 to 34
listening to broadcast radio in an average day.
“There are a lot of critics out there who want to write
off broadcast radio,
but this analysis of real-time media consumption shows that it continues to play
a very strong role,” said
Dr. Michael Link,
VP of Methodological Research at The Nielsen Company.
While the recent
emergence of portable
audio devices like
the iPod and other MP3 players was considered a threat to traditional forms of
audio, this study’s evidence suggests that the new technology has
had a positive effect
on radio consumption. In fact, radio was found to have a higher reach (82%) among
those who listen to portable audio devices, compared to the average reach for
all audio consumers.
“This study proves that radio is still a popular medium
for the tech-savvy,
MP3-playing 18-34 year old consumer,” said
Jeff Haley, President
and CEO of the Radio Advertising Bureau (RAB). “This groundbreaking observational
study of today’s
consumer proves that
the primary source of new music is the radio.”
The study was conducted
by observing the
media usage among
participants in five
DMAs (Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Philadelphia, and Seattle) in the spring and
fall of 2008. Many of the broadcast listening trends were consistent with the
findings from Nielsen’s 51-market radio ratings
released in September.
“The results of this study confirm
radio’s importance
with all socio-economic
groups within the
United States, as well as with those that consume other audio
platforms that had been perceived to be usurping radio’s
audio dominance,” said
Bob McCurdy, President
of Katz Marketing
Solutions.
Another key takeaway from the reports
is that broadcast
radio is the dominant
form of audio media
at home, work, and
in the car.
Other findings highlighted in the report include:
· Audio media exposure has the highest reach among
those with higher levels of education and income.
· Approximately 12% of study participants listened
to MP3s and iPods for an average of 69 minutes per day, yet eight-in-ten
of these individuals also listened to broadcast radio for an average
of 97 minutes per day.
October 21, 2009
Center For Media Research
Gender and Age Consumption
Differs in Evolving Media Usage Patterns
According to a new
consumer trend report
from TargetCast tcm, among American adults between the ages of
18-64, the future of traditional media, particularly newspapers,
magazines and radio, is challenged by the rapid migration of hard-to-reach
consumer groups to digital alternatives. However, when it comes
to purchase influence on consumers, traditional media remains
more influential when compared to digital advertising.
The study
reveals a divide
between men and women in how each gender engages with traditional
media, and illustrates how a generational divide is affecting
purchase influence among adults.
Peter Sedlarcik, SVP, Director of Insights and Analytics at
TargetCast tcm, says "... marketers must take into account
the evolving media preferences of specific target audiences...
yet, while many may declare print media is dead... findings show
that marketing messages in newspapers and magazines still score
well in terms of consumer attentiveness and purchase influence."
Key findings:
- Men and women are consuming media differently. Men are more
likely than women
to indicate that printed news is a less relevant source of news
and information
- Newspapers and magazines are not considered as
relevant today
and are easiest
to eliminate from usage, yet score well in terms of attentiveness
and purchase influence
- The biggest usage declines were
found among men
and young adults
18-34 in newspapers,
magazines and radio
- TV and Internet, respectively,
identified as
most important
media, though
young adults
18-34 rank the
internet as more important than TV
- 60% of consumers say newspapers
need to change
the most to stay
relevant, compared
to 30% for magazines
and nearly 20%
for radio. Fewer
than 10% feel that TV or the Internet needs to change to stay
relevant. Nevertheless, those ages 35+ still consider newspaper
ads to be more influential in determining their purchase decisions.
The majority of adults 18-64 report that they are still using
the same amount of
each medium today as they were a year ago, however nearly a third
say they are using less printed media (newspapers and magazines).
Conversely, a third or more also report that they are using the
Internet more as both a source of information and entertainment.
Compared to a year ago would you say you
are currently using the following media more, about the same
or less? (Adults 18-64) |
Media | Using More | About The Same | Less |
TV | 19% | 68% | 13% |
Radio | 12 | 71 | 18 |
Magazines | 10 | 60 | 30 |
Newspapers | 9 | 58 | 33 |
Internet (information) | 42 | 54 | 4 |
Internet (entertainment) | 28 | 59 | 13 |
Source: TargetCast tcm, October 2009 |
The data reveals a split between men and women in terms of the
way each gender engages with traditional media and embraces newer
media. In general, men are more willing to adapt their usage habits
to incorporate more digital and online platforms as replacements
for traditional media. On the other hand, women are more likely
to hold strong with the traditional media and are more hesitant
to embrace newer media.
The study also indicated that there is a marked generational
difference in attention to digital media between adults ages 18-34
and adults and those older than age 35:
- Adults ages 18-34 are more likely to have replaced newspapers
and magazines
with internet content, while adults older than 25 are more likely
to consider magazines and newspapers as valuable sources of information
- Adults
ages 18-24 are
more likely to
say radio is not as relevant and that they prefer reading magazines
online. This age group also indicates they don't mind watching
ads when watching TV programs online
- Adults aged 18-34 are more
likely than other
consumer groups
to consider advertising
on the internet influential in their purchase decision
- 40% of
Adults 18-64
say that they prefer the experience of
reading printed
newspapers over
online news sources. Additionally, newspapers score well both
in terms of ad attentiveness and purchase influence. However,
when asked if they'd rather get news from online sources than
from printed newspapers, the percentage of those who agreed vs.
disagreed was about the same. And, people do not feel that newspapers
are more trustworthy than online sources.
72% of consumers expect that sourcing the newspaper online should
be free, and not willing to pay for an online newspaper subscription
to replace their printed newspapers subscription.
A solid 57% say they prefer the experience of reading a printed
magazine over reading a magazine on the Internet. An even stronger
71% would not be willing to pay for an online magazine subscription
to replace their printed magazine subscription. Also, only 15%
of respondents overall agree that they'd rather read magazines
online. Additionally, printed magazines score well in terms of
ad attentiveness and purchase influence.
41% of those surveyed indicate that radio is still relevant
in today's media environment. According to respondents, radio
provides a great venue to discover new music that cannot be experienced
elsewhere. And, respondents overall prefer to listen to music
through the radio station vs. Internet stations or on their mp3
player.
In summary, the report concludes that monitoring the pulse of
consumer sentiment is a critical component of working toward a
better understanding of the future of all media. Understanding
the changing nature of how people now consume media may allow
the media industry to reclaim the intimate relationship between
the reader and their brands. The report notes that:
- Newspapers have a legacy of breaking news and uncovering stories
of historic proportion,
yet they are losing ground to a generation of consumers embracing
digital and mobile alternatives
- Established magazines, often iconic
brands, have
begun to lose
advertiser support after years of consistent readership and inspiring
content
- Over the past 100 years radio has been a ubiquitous part
of our daily
lives. However,
after surviving the challenges of broadcast TV, the emergence
of cable and the launch of the Internet, radio is slowly being
tuned out by a generation addicted to personal, programmable
MP3 players,
iPods, iPhones and other multi-media devices
- While many will continue
to use traditional
and new media as much as they have in the past, it is important
to understand the shifting relationship between how men and women
and different generations will consume media in the future so
the industry can evolve these media in a way that is relevant
and impactful to consumers
October 1 , 2009
Traditional Media Still Influential in Travel Decisions
About 117 million Americans -- or about 52% of U.S. adults --
have taken at least
a two-day trip in
the last two years.
But only 47% of them
used the Internet
to research and make travel arrangements, per a new study.
C. Lee
Smith, president
and CEO of Ad-ology Research, tells MediaDailyNews that Web sites
for specific hotels, attractions
and locations ranked
high in the survey, but conceded he was a little
surprised that just
half of those surveyed
relied on the Web
to arrange travel. "Another surprise is
that travel magazines
did as well as they
did, as did newspapers'
entertainment sections.
Traditional media is still
holding its own."
Magazines were
the most influential
for travel services; newspapers were the most influential for
local attractions.
Some 39% of recent travelers say online media actually influenced
their choice of travel
services, with hotel/bed
and breakfast Web
sites having the
most influence. Thirty
four percent used
the Internet to search
for flights, and
31% to search for
hotels.
The data is per Westerville, Ohio-based Ad-ology Research's
study on media influence
on consumer choice
in travel services.
The firm says online
content also influenced
34% to visit local
attractions and events,
like amusement parks,
zoos and concerts.
Traditional media
influenced 27% of travelers and 32.7% of those visiting local
attractions.
The firm found that word of mouth and digital also had a major
influence, especially
on younger consumers.
Social media influenced the travel choices of 35.9% of 18-24s,
versus 23% of all U.S. adults.
Markets where spending on airfare is highest are New York, Los
Angeles, San Francisco,
Chicago, Philadelphia,
Washington, Boston,
Dallas, Houston and
Atlanta, in descending
order. For the study,
Ad-ology surveyed an online consumer panel of 1,154 adults in
January.
Click to read this article on the MediaPostPublications.com website
September 30 , 2009
Wendy Attended a Mobile Webinar presented by Nielsen on 9/15.
47% of Mobile of people who were exposed to an ad on a mobile
phone responded to the ad
Demographics
Smart Phone users
Skew male
Skew 25-35
Us mostly for business
Ownership
As of July 2009
In the US there are
7.5 million IPhones owners and 12-15 million blackberry owners
22.5% of all phones
purchased in the last 6 months were smart phones.
8.8% own Blackberrys
4.5% own Iphones
9.2% other Smartphones.
17% of the US owns Smartphones
19% of mobile users use the prepay service.
This type of user
indexes high for Hispanics and African Americans
Usage (Q2 2009)
Twitter
3.676 million Unique
users
85 transactions per
user
Weather channel
1,096 million unique
users
99 transactions per
user
In the past 30 days, mobile owners
60% text
25% use the internet
7% video
Moms 25-44
Index high for sending
pictures via text messaging
and text messaging.
July 2, 2009
On June
23rd I had the honor
of joining some great
guys on a panel at
the 2009 California
Conference on Tourism.The
session topic was “ROI
Measuring the Immeasureable”. Many people requested
I send them my portion
of the session. So
here is a link. I
would like to also
say “thanks” to my fellow panel
guests, David Bratton,
David Kendrick, John
Poimiroo, Tim Zahner."
TV and Magazine Ads More Effective Than Ads on Internet
April 1, 2009. New York, NY. McPheters & Company has released
results of a study conducted in co-operation with Condé Nast
and CBS Vision which explored the relative effectiveness of ads
on television, in magazines, and on the Internet. The study represents
an unusual example of collaboration on the part of companies with
competing media interests.
The study used McPheters & Company's AdWorksTM methodology
to provide comparable measures of ad effectiveness across multiple
media, using 30-second TV ads, full-page 4-color magazine ads,
and Internet banner ads in standard sizes. Additionally, eye-tracking
software was used to determine whether – and under what
circumstances – Internet ads were actually seen by respondents.
The work was conducted in CBS Vision's state-of-the-art Television
City facilities at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas.
Matched groups of
respondents were recruited to spend 30 minutes with a single medium
in a laboratory setting. They either watched a choice of sit-coms,
read a magazine they selected, or surfed the Internet at will.
At the end of the period, they filled out similar online surveys
that asked whether they recalled seeing 4 ads which appeared in
the medium they consumed; in order to establish the level of over-claiming,
which is known to vary by medium, they were also asked whether
they recalled seeing 4 ads that had not appeared. These results
were then used to calculate net recall or ad absorption for each
medium.
Among the major findings
were:
- Within a half hour, magazines effectively delivered more than
twice the number of ad impressions as TV and more than 6 times
those delivered online
- Though TV doesn't deliver as many ads per half hour as do
magazines, net recall of TV ads was almost twice that of magazine
ads; magazines in turn had ad recall almost three times that
of Internet banner ads
- 85% of Internet ads served appeared on-screen and could be
identified by brand
- Among web users, 63% of banner ads were not seen. Respondents'
eyes passed over 37% of the Internet ads and stopped on slightly
less than a third
- For Internet ads, almost all net recall could be attributed
to ads that were seen
- Internet video ads appeared much less frequently than banner
ads, and their exposure skewed heavily towards young men. When
they did appear they were twice as likely to be seen as banner
ads.
When study results were used in combination with other information
on probability of exposure, a full-page 4-color magazine ad was
determined to have 83% of the value of a 30-second television
commercial, while a typical Internet banner ad has 16% of the
value.
According to Scott
McDonald, Senior Vice-President of Research for Condé Nast, “Because
different media deliver ad impressions at vastly different rates,
this study provides clear evidence that time spent with a medium
does not translate into value for advertisers. It also indicates
that magazine advertising is undervalued relative to its effectiveness.” Dave
Poltrack, Chief Research Officer for CBS and President of CBS
Vision, said “As more and more advertisers try to figure
out how to communicate their story across media platforms, this
form of experimental research will become an increasingly critical
element in pre-campaign planning.”
“Our findings indicate that we need to learn more about how to engage
Internet users with advertising content,” said Rebecca McPheters, CEO
of McPheters & Company. “We look forward to expanding this work to
look more closely at other forms of Internet advertising, as well as other media – such
as cable, newspapers and radio, and specific types of programming or content.
While the sample sizes were not significantly robust to release results for
individual ad categories, the study suggests that there are real differences
in performance that are worthy of further exploration,” she added.
About McPheters & Company
McPheters & Company specializes in strategic planning and
research for brands and for companies in media-related fields,
including media owners, advertisers, and ad agencies. The company
develops business strategies to enhance both long- and short-term
profitability. Much of its work is focused on enhancing and documenting
the advertising value produced by media brands.
With a new experiment from Harris Interactive, there
is some strong evidence
that people exposed
to both Radio and
website ads are impacted
more strongly than
those exposed to
website ads alone:
Unaided recall for
the mix of one Internet
and one Radio exposure
for these advertisers
was four-and-a-half
times as high as
the unaided recall
for two Internet
ads alone. And the
mix of one Radio
and one Internet
exposure had more
than twice the aided
recall of two Internet
ads. Furthermore,
a mix of Radio and
Internet exposures
also demonstrated
clear potential to
elevate other kinds
of consumer impact, ranging from website visitation to emotional
bonds, when the Radio ads them selves are impactful. Five of the
Radio campaigns tested were especially effective.
Overall, the picture seems clear: Radio and the Internet can
be powerful advertising
complements. Whether
the goal is to reach more people, or to reach them with greater
impact, this particular combination of media seems to be a recipe
that’s worthy
of more consideration.
(source, Arbitron)
BIG research analysed its Simultaneous Media Usage Survey for
RAMA, the Retail
Advertising & Marketing Association. When
asked which media prompt an online search during the buying decision-making
process, 47.2% said magazine advertising – the highest score
for any medium. Magazine advertising’s high score was consistent
across sex, income, age
and region.
43.7% of consumers were prompted to go online by an article,
42.8% by TV advertising and 42.3% by newspaper advertising.
|